Real time monitoring of the adequacy of ventilation (i.e. how much carbon dioxide a patient breathes out) could saved Leah’s life.
by Michael Wong
Real time monitoring of the adequacy of ventilation (i.e. how much carbon dioxide a patient breathes out) could save patients’ lives, recent research suggests.
Just ask Lenore Alexander, whose daughter Leah had elective surgery for pectus carinatum, a fairly common condition where the sternum protrudes forward caused by an overgrowth of cartilage.
“Leah was a healthy 11-year-old girl. In the surgery,” says her mother, “the doctors used an epidural anesthetic, which was left in place for post-operative pain management. I stayed with Leah that night and finally fell asleep after being up for more than 36 hours, ever since Leah checked in. When I woke up two hours later, I found Leah dead. My screams were what alerted hospital staff that something had happened to Leah.”
“Leah was not monitored, either by a pulse oximeter or capnograph,” says Ms. Alexander. “Had she been monitored, perhaps she would still be alive today.”
Dr. David Crippen (Associate Professor of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) explains the need for real time monitoring of adequacy of ventilation:
To prevent respiratory depression, patients need to be monitored in real time, and not just when caregivers periodically check on their patients. Capnography is the only way to assess adequacy of ventilation (not oxygenation) for patients on controlled mechanical ventilation. If patients on a ventilator become hypoxic for whatever reason, and the pCO2 stays constant, they do not necessarily become agitated (hypercarbia induced catecholamine release and agitation). They simply go to sleep. The pulseox will not alarm in hypercarbic or hypocarbic states in the face of normal oxygenation. Therefore, capnography is necessary to assess whether ventilation is proceeding normally in real time. It also assesses possible bronchospasm, thumbnail guesses of deadspace and of course, whether the patient has air entering the trachea after intubation. It gives a tremendous amount of useful information at a glance and also allows troubleshooting in real time.
According to Dr. Jenifer Lightdale (Director, Patient Safety and Quality, Division of GI/Nutrition, Children’s Hospital Boston), “Current guidelines for monitoring patient safety during moderate sedation in children call for continuous pulse oximetry and visual assessment. Pulse oximetry does not measure ventilation. We did a study a few years ago that showed that capnography improves the current standard of care for monitoring sedated children by allowing early detection of respiratory compromise, prompting intervention to minimize hypoxemia.”
In the study conducted by Dr. Lightdale and her colleagues, the goal was to determine whether intervention based on capnography indications of alveolar hypoventilation reduces the incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation in nonintubated children receiving moderate sedation for nonsurgical procedures. The investigators found that capnography indicated alveolar hypoventilation during 56% of procedures and apnea during 24%.
“End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring is widely available and currently routinely used for intubated patients,” says Dr. Lightdale. “Several studies have found that continuous monitoring by capnography even if a patient is ventilating on their own, without being intubated, is feasible in very young children. Capnography could be applied more frequently in other clinical situations, such as in pediatric intensive care units. Moreover, the results of our study may be generalizable to adult populations in a variety of settings.”
Dr. Melissa Langhan (Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Emergency Medicine, at Yale School of Medicine) concurs:
Capnography is currently the only way to monitor in real time the adequacy of ventilation. Medical guidelines for monitoring during general anesthesia recognize the importance of monitoring with capnography. Unfortunately, continuous capnography is not routinely used outside of the operating room. Capnography can really enhance patient safety, and healthcare professionals need to think about using it more often. As our study found, using capnography enhanced patient safety, by being able to detect declines in end tidal CO2 indicating hypoventilation which could lead to hypoxemia.
In the study conducted by Dr. Langhan and her colleagues at the Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, at Yale University School of Medicine, they analyzed children undergoing common procedures involving sedation, such as for fracture reduction, laceration repair, and incision and drainage of an abscess. 72% of the episodes of prolonged hypoxia were preceded by decreases in ETco2 as measured by capnography. This suggests that the use of capnography would enhance patient safety by decreasing the frequency of hypoxia during sedation in children.
Dr. Langhan explains further:
We wanted to assess the degree of hypopneic ventilation, which is very difficult to detect on clinical exam. Once we enrolled our children, we were monitoring with capnography. We found that 50% of our subjects had declines in their end tidal CO2 values indicating hypopneic hypoventilation. Some of those were transient, but about one-third of our patients had persistent declines in end tidal CO2. We then found that about one-fourth to a third went on to declines in their pulse oximetry. So, our patients who had declines in end tidal CO2 were six times more likely to go on to develop hypoxemia, than those who did not.
Can we prevent another outcome like Leah’s? Her mother sincerely hopes so:
It is truly incomprehensible that Leah’s death could have been prevented by monitoring. I urge all parents to ensure their children are continuously monitored in real time after surgery, so another mother does not have to suffer the loss and heartache that I have had to endure.
5 thoughts on “Would Real-Time Monitoring Have Saved Leah?”
We are using end-tidal CO2 during our deep sedations in both Peds and Adult Emergency Departments now. I think this is wise. But I can’t recall a situation in which it actually changed my management during the sedation. Of course we have a doctor for sedation, nurse for sedation, RT for sedation, doctor for the procedure, and a resident or two. So unrecognized hypoventilation is unlikely with so many eyes watching. It seems end tidal would really be a benefit in settings in which a patient can’t be watched as closely. Our anesthesia colleagues would have to comment on the situation with Leah. So sad.
It is hard to imagine that none of the monitors (O2, Apnea or CO2) were used. Any one of these could have possibly saved her life. “Would Real-Time Monitoring Have Saved Leah?” – Yes.
Would real time monitoring have saved Leah? Yes. And, at what many consider the finest hospital in california, somebody involved in this childs care taking the time to listen, look and see the condition she was in would have been helpful. Her epidural narcotic infusion was raised as many times as permissable, yet still she complained of severe pain and dozed in and out of consciousness. Her parents requests to speak to the anesthesiologist were ignored. Nobody checked the epidural site. At Leahs autopsy it was discovered that the epidural was not placed in the epidural cavity, but was in the intrapleural space of the left lung.
I did not realize I was the person responsible for keeping Leah alive. At that point, I trusted the doctors and nurses to give her the care she required. Today, because of everything I have learned as I navigate through a life without my daughter,I would know enough to have kept her alive. No mother should be put in that position when the technology already exists to monitor a patient post op. To have a term “dead in bed” even exist in 2011 is disgraceful.
I am so grateful that this very painful story is being discussed. Let us hope that the legacy is beneficial to many, many children who may otherwise have been placed in harm’s way and Mom’s who cannot help but feel responsible for an error that was not theirs to correct. Thank you, Lenore, for advocating Leah and for all of us. The medical community must embrace those who speak out: this should guide necessary corrections in the system.
Leah’s mother has written a very poignant account of the events leading up to her daughter’s death. Her plea is that all patients receiving sedation should be monitored so that “no other mother has to live with the pain I endure, when the solution is within reach and so easy to implement”: http://wp.me/p1JikT-dv